zlacker

>>iambat+(OP)
How about if we don't make lots of wide authoritarian bans to make people behave according our will instead of their own. How about if we rule the world from the bottom up instead of the top down? What if we just mostly, you know, live and let live? Going with free speech, including billboards, is a good place to start trying out such a wild plan.

>>delich+21
anarchy, eh? lawlesness is what you pitch is?

>>bdangu+a1
People like you say this until the other party is in power, and bans stuff you don’t like, then you will cry about free speech too.

I won’t die on the hill of saving billboards anymore than id die on the hill of not taxing billionaires but sorry, whats fair is fair.

>>Vaslo+13
I am actually arguing quite the opposite, I am very anti-banning but where do you draw the line? it is a fine line between lawlessness and allowing bunch of idiots (regardless of which "political party" they are affiliated with) to make these decisions. so how do you get this done? obviously lawlessness is not the answer?