zlacker

[return to "Bikes in the age of tariffs"]
1. mullin+qx[view] [source] 2025-04-03 20:22:20
>>bobcha+(OP)
I've never been a political donor, I might've thrown $20 into a small donation a couple times. However, it seems financially irresponsible not to pour everything up to the legal limit into punishing everyone involved in this tax hike to the maximum extent.
◧◩
2. toomuc+WB[view] [source] 2025-04-03 20:46:04
>>mullin+qx
The politics are important, and that effort must continue, but also directly targeting conservative voters economically. When they have distressed assets to sell, farmland, homes, businesses, I am ready to buy at a substantial discount. I have prepared to lever up with access to debt for this opportunity, and I recommend others who can do so. I want to buy when there is blood in the streets (economically), but only taking from those who caused this.
◧◩◪
3. palmot+iO[view] [source] 2025-04-03 21:53:43
>>toomuc+WB
> ...but also directly targeting conservative voters economically.

That's kind of an asshole move. Did people react to having their communities and livelihoods damaged by neoliberalism, in a way not approved by economically advantaged software engineers? Don't try to solve their problems in a better way, try to fuck them even harder instead! We should teach 'em to get fucked and not complain!

If you want to target anyone, you should target the people who made a shit-ton of money off of neoliberalism, in a way that paved the path for Trump.

◧◩◪◨
4. bryanl+JP[view] [source] 2025-04-03 22:04:27
>>palmot+iO
That's not why they're targeting conservative voters. They're targeting the states & districts of senators and congressmen who are voting for Trump's agenda in an effort to get them to change their vote.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. palmot+xR[view] [source] 2025-04-03 22:17:31
>>bryanl+JP
> That's not why they're targeting conservative voters. They're targeting the states & districts of senators and congressmen who are voting for Trump's agenda in an effort to get them to change their vote.

No. The post I was responding to literally was talking about personally taking advantage of conservative voters, not their representatives. The post above that talked about "punishing everyone involved in this tax hike to the maximum extent. It's pretty clear it's just a "fuck you," aimed at regular people.

No introspection, no proposals for solving the problems that would cause people to give tariffs a chance, just punishment. It's neoliberals saying, "we don't give two shit about you, if you resist our beatings, we'll just beat your harder for being uppity."

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. nulloc+7j1[view] [source] 2025-04-04 02:50:43
>>palmot+xR
Interesting the way you framed this. Especially the part about liberals doing the beatings and threatening more of them.

One party had a message and large portion of it's voter base focused on messages and policies that can only be described as hateful and harmful. Now that it seems like that harm is transpiring and surprise surprise just as the "we don't give two shits about you" liberals warned that harm is at best indiscriminate and at worst going to impact those spiteful voters the most.

Trump is doing exactly what he said he'd do, tariff all the things, these people proudly and loudly voted for the (self-inflicted) punishment you're describing.

[go to top]