zlacker

[return to "Everyone knows all the apps on your phone"]
1. turble+KJ[view] [source] 2025-03-30 05:53:28
>>gnitin+(OP)
I still, will never understand the need for native "Apps". To this day, I have never seen an "App" that couldn't simply have been a website/webapp. Most of them would likely be improved by being a webapp.

The only benefits I can see of "Apps", are the developer get's access to private information they really don't need.

Yeah, they get to be on the "App Store". But the "App Store" is a totally unnecessary concept introduced by Apple/Google so they could scrape a huge percentage in sales.

Web browsers have good (not perfect) sandboxing, costs no fees to "submit" and are accessible to everyone on every phone.

◧◩
2. xxprog+tR[view] [source] 2025-03-30 07:35:24
>>turble+KJ
Simple, UX.

The reality is, most webapps for mobile just suck. The UX is nowhere near that of a native application. I don't want any text to be selectable. I don't want pull to refresh on every page. I don't want the left-swipe to take me to the previous page.

You can probably find workarounds for all these issues. The new Silk library (https://silkhq.co/) is the first case I've seen that get's very close to a native experience. But even the fact that this is a paid library comes to show how non-trivial this is.

◧◩◪
3. nodar8+wk1[view] [source] 2025-03-30 13:22:31
>>xxprog+tR
> I don't want any text to be selectable

Disabling text selection is not just worse UX, it is actively user-hostile

[go to top]