zlacker

>>pseudo+(OP)
aside from all the practical arguments listed out in other comments, i simply don't support corporations building in space. space should only be multi-national projects, similar to the way the ISS is managed

>>nektro+ou
I can think of a bunch of great reasons to be wary about this, but at the same time it feels inevitable, doesn't it? Biggest reason I don't like it is the fact a big rock lobbed at earth from the moon is one of the lowest cost of entry WMD programs imaginable.

Seems like it's only a matter of time before someone deploys their capital to another space rock, convinces people to go with them, and then declares sovereignty of that rock. What comes with that is all the same stories history tells over and over, just again, on a different rock.

>>MrLeap+dv
You can drop sacks of money from low earth orbit that would do just as much damage and be way cheaper.

>>genewi+yf2
I'll take your word for it. I lose intuition for how far away the moon is and how much delta - V it takes to get back to earth.

I do think the moon has an advantage from a standpoint that the material is already there. You have to "shoot up hill" to stop the gun from getting loaded.