zlacker

[return to "San Francisco homelessness: Park ranger helps one person at a time"]
1. radu_f+px[view] [source] 2025-02-17 05:05:36
>>NaOH+(OP)
> shepherding him through what one Recreation and Parks Department official described as the “arduous and achingly bureaucratic tasks” necessary just to be eligible for housing.

I'm going to risk a political statement and say that this is why I'm mostly hopeful about DOGE, even if parts of it are a shit show.

Building civilization comes with a hefty dose of institutional entropy, which keeps accumulating, despite (or often because) good intentions and competence. Everybody is improving their piece of the map, but this means you get stuck in a lot of spots of local maxima. Some can be fixed from a level above, but some need a round of creative destruction every 10 years or so.

I've read this yesterday: https://unchartedterritories.tomaspueyo.com/p/why-japan-succ...

It's a good read and a good blog for many reasons, but the relevant part to this conversation: Japan managed to keep a very high level of living even through decades of economic stagnation and aging population in large part by having a sane zoning system. Yes, that simple. They have 12, nation-wide, mostly inclusive zoning types. This means the permitted building types carry over as you move up the categories, allowing mixed-use development by default.

And indeed, you can actually go to Japan and buy a house for about the price of a decent car - which coincidently used to be the case in most of the world, before the double pressure of zoning/coding on one hand, and migration towards urban centers on the other squeezed the housing pricing way above what actual costs would have it be.

◧◩
2. Tade0+0J[view] [source] 2025-02-17 07:11:17
>>radu_f+px
> This means the permitted building types carry over as you move up the categories, allowing mixed-use development by default.

That is more or less how it works all around the world except the US. Or rather: mixed use is the default, outside of specific cases

◧◩◪
3. genewi+HR[view] [source] 2025-02-17 08:34:35
>>Tade0+0J
Cool. The US is the third largest country in the world; not all of us have to live above a restaurant or laundry. Or in apartments or other multi-tenant housing.

Those of us that want to can move to San Francisco or New York.

The state i live in has fewer people than metro Los Angeles. What works for them for housing is unnecessary for us.

◧◩◪◨
4. johnny+6H2[view] [source] 2025-02-17 21:53:04
>>genewi+HR
Okay, no one was talking about your town. I'm not even sure if your state/town has zoning laws.

SF and LA have a lot less "living above a restaurant" because of those.

[go to top]