zlacker

[return to "San Francisco homelessness: Park ranger helps one person at a time"]
1. mrlamb+8d[view] [source] 2025-02-17 01:59:13
>>NaOH+(OP)
I was really swept up in this article and the portrait of Amanda Barrows - what a unique and strong person and this city is incredibly lucky to have her.

Unlike some here, I came away with a deep sense of empathy, and today’s HN snark and frustration bounced off me pretty hard. The public order issues - homelessness in parks, the challenges of shared spaces—have certainly impacted me. But more than that, I struggle with how to translate the state of the world to my boys. I always remind them: every unhoused person was once a little boy or girl. We might be older now, but we’re still kids inside, and nobody dreams of growing up in these circumstances.

What struck me most was the balance of compassion and pragmatism that Amanda brings to her work. It’s easy to be frustrated with the policies and bureaucratic inefficiencies that slow down real solutions - but they are, in some ways, understandable.

The biggest frustration for me is the gap between the mental state of many unhoused individuals and the requirements needed to secure housing. The city surely understands the long-term costs of its policies, and it’s run by highly pragmatic people with limited budgets. But rules are rules, and at some point, top-down accommodations (including medical interventions...) are necessary to bridge this gap.

◧◩
2. Erigmo+ZI[view] [source] 2025-02-17 07:11:06
>>mrlamb+8d
Amanda's work is proof that personal engagement makes a difference, but scaling that kind of approach is incredibly difficult
◧◩◪
3. throwa+M22[view] [source] 2025-02-17 17:15:48
>>Erigmo+ZI
what happened to "do things that don't scale"?
◧◩◪◨
4. bagels+En2[view] [source] 2025-02-17 19:26:47
>>throwa+M22
We're missing all the rest of the steps, but besides, I'm not sure how that applies when there's no profit motive.
[go to top]