zlacker

[return to "I still like Sublime Text"]
◧
1. BiteCo+N1[view] [source] 2025-01-29 07:06:37
>>james2+(OP)
Same. I tried zed but it doesn't come close.
◧◩
2. bayind+t2[view] [source] 2025-01-29 07:12:26
>>BiteCo+N1
Zed tries too hard to be magical, plus their license terms are not the best.

Before anyone asks any further. See the CLA [0] and the Privacy Policy [1].

[0]: https://zed.dev/cla

[1]: https://zed.dev/privacy-policy

◧◩◪
3. WD-42+m4[view] [source] 2025-01-29 07:30:52
>>bayind+t2
It's GPL. How is the license not the best?
◧◩◪◨
4. bayind+t4[view] [source] 2025-01-29 07:32:29
>>WD-42+m4
See the attached CLA [0] and Privacy Policy [1].

[0]: https://zed.dev/cla

[1]: https://zed.dev/privacy-policy

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. WD-42+E5[view] [source] 2025-01-29 07:50:30
>>bayind+t4
And yet, ST is closed source. Still a wild comparison.

This isn’t just license preference either. I would imagine the efforts of the sublime lsp people would be greatly eased if they had access to the source.

But nah zed bad because cla.

[go to top]