zlacker

[return to "Ross Ulbricht granted a full pardon"]
1. steve_+f5[view] [source] 2025-01-22 00:51:15
>>Ozarki+(OP)
Well, I think that justice has been served. The feds' prosecution of Ulbricht was the epitome of throwing the book at someone to make an example, when the government's case was pretty flawed, in my opinion. 10 years is enough time to pay the debt of running the silk road.

I am glad that Ulbricht has been pardoned and I feel like a small iota of justice has been returned to the world with this action.

◧◩
2. zanek+zp[view] [source] 2025-01-22 03:17:42
>>steve_+f5
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills reading the comments on this thread. Multiple teenagers (one in Australia) died from the drugs distributed on Silk Road. Ross was ok with selling grenades, body parts, etc on there. But everyone is saying he served his time ???
◧◩◪
3. loeg+Qu[view] [source] 2025-01-22 04:05:10
>>zanek+zp
People regularly die from drinking alcohol. Should liquor store owners be doing life in prison? (And why are Australians special?)
◧◩◪◨
4. Tracke+ma1[view] [source] 2025-01-22 11:04:52
>>loeg+Qu
If the liquor store owner knows that some of those bottles might contain pure methanol, and people end up dying from drinking said methanol...then, yes, I do think the store owner should do some serious jailtime.

Which is what this boils down to. Ross didn't know what people were selling. Could be pure high-quality stuff, could be contaminated stuff, could be stuff that was cut up with fent. He made money either way.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. Workac+ER1[view] [source] 2025-01-22 15:58:04
>>Tracke+ma1
Ironically silk road had much safer drugs than whatever pills you would get on the corner.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. Capric+Fh3[view] [source] 2025-01-23 01:28:10
>>Workac+ER1
The Silk Road was "the corner." Do you think it would be any safer if it was running today? That makes 0 sense.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. Workac+EB4[view] [source] 2025-01-23 14:59:30
>>Capric+Fh3
Sellers had ratings and reputations. It also allowed the long string of shady middlemen to be cut out.

Drug producers want pure products. It's almost entirely middlemen who cut drugs with whatever random chemicals they have on hand.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. Capric+Ao5[view] [source] 2025-01-23 20:24:53
>>Workac+EB4
> It also allowed the long string of shady middlemen to be cut out

Based on what? This sounds completely made up. Anyone could sell on Silk Road, and faking reviews would be trivial on an anonymous platform. And if someone died from drugs they bought, they're not exactly leaving a review, are they?

Sellers have reputations in real life, but it can actually be difficult to link a death to a specific dealer without a thorough investigation. Even more so on an anonymous platform. Would Silk Road have cared if the police linked deaths to a specific seller? Fuck no.

For the record, I am not anti Silk Road, I'm actually for legalizing drugs. I just find the notion that drugs online were inherently cleaner to be naive Libertarian propaganda.

[go to top]