zlacker

>>headal+(OP)
The irony of trying to read this article and being assaulted by cookie warnings and ad popups that appear while scrolling is not lost on me.

>>nixpul+Jo1
Sadly they have no control over the cookie warnings

>>ramon1+Ep2
People say that but it's not really true. If they just have 1P cookies for basic functionality (login), then I believe there can be a discreet notice at the bottom informing the user of that fact. Groups like IEEE should be the ones pioneering those patterns.

>>AdamN+qX2
AFAIK, only 3rd party cookies require this consent. I am pretty sure you require consent for 2nd party as well. Your own site's cookies? Do what you want.

GDPR, however, also covers other things like your storing user's data, but that is separate from cookies. Cookies are stored on user's device.

>>prerok+h74
What do you mean by second party here?