zlacker

[return to "Calm tech certification "rewards" less distracting tech"]
1. pedalp+Q61[view] [source] 2025-01-21 21:08:39
>>headal+(OP)
We're building a neuromodulation sleep headband, and we've always had the aim of getting to the point where the user puts it on, it does it's thing (slow-wave enhancement) the person takes it off in the morning and goes about their day.

I don't even want to put IO into the device at all. Not only because it increases cost and size, but because I don't what the user having to interact. We have to find better ways to fit the device in your life, so you don't even think about it.

◧◩
2. adhoc_+Oh1[view] [source] 2025-01-21 22:29:53
>>pedalp+Q61
Do you get many people thinking this product is snakeoil?
◧◩◪
3. pedalp+5p4[view] [source] 2025-01-22 21:49:16
>>adhoc_+Oh1
I wish there were more!

There is a ton of snake oil in the industry, and I see so many people building similar products, that take the language of the research papers, and apply it to absolute nonsense.

There is over a decade of research in slow-wave enhancement, Philips funds a lot of research in this space, and even had a slow-wave enhancement device out in 2018/2019.

I'm not sure if what you are asking is "are we snake oil", or "do I get people asking". But in general, I hear so many people talk about grounding mats (no scientific evidence), EMF, neuromodulation to put you to sleep instantly, and so much other garbage, that I wish people would question things more.

I wish people knew how to read a basic research paper and decide if it even says what the company is claiming. I'm amazed that a company can put up a page that says "science", with a picture of a person in a lab coat, and people go "ok, must be true".

We're on a long view of this, and while VCs are dumping tens of millions into snake oil "neuromodulation" companies, we're taking a slower approach and playing the long-term game.

I'm keen to hear your thoughts.

[go to top]