zlacker

[return to "Ross Ulbricht granted a full pardon"]
1. consta+2v1[view] [source] 2025-01-22 13:43:52
>>Ozarki+(OP)
Here is what the discussion looked like almost a decade ago: >>9626985

Very striking to see how the sentiment has drastically shifted, while the facts of the case did not. There is a really cultural shift visible in how this issue is seen on here.

◧◩
2. rescri+Jz1[view] [source] 2025-01-22 14:11:09
>>consta+2v1
I'd be wary of drawing correlations like this. The people who commented on that thread are not going to be the same people commenting on this one. The topic isn't even the same; in the first thread the topic is his sentencing, and in this its his pardon.

The attraction for people to post on Hacker News is mainly to complain, and so in the first you get complaints the sentencing is too harsh, and in this one you get complaints that he shouldn't have been pardoned. Its not necessarily a cultural shift, just an artifact of the types of discussions people have online.

◧◩◪
3. smeege+QA1[view] [source] 2025-01-22 14:18:15
>>rescri+Jz1
its crazy to look at this old thread and know that i almost certainly left a comment in it. although ive created and left behind hundreds of accounts in the meantime. i first got on HN feb 2015 when i read an article about “famed god” getting arrested in las vegas… his shirt had “hack the world” written on it and when i googled “hack the world famed god,” not knowing about the movie reference, it gave me a HN thread about the incident. and then HN became my home for almost ten years… i didnt have facebook or instagram or vine. i literally just spent all my time on HN. now that the displacement of programmers by AI has begun, somehow my interest has waned.

at the time, the murder for hire accusations seemed legitimate and they still do today. hopefully they charge him with attempted murder if the statute of limitations isnt up.

◧◩◪◨
4. echoan+XB1[view] [source] 2025-01-22 14:24:33
>>smeege+QA1
It was dismissed with prejudice, and can’t be tried again:

https://freeross.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Doc_14_Dismi...

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. smeege+iE1[view] [source] 2025-01-22 14:39:30
>>echoan+XB1
ok. so for some reason the federal government indicted him on attempted murder in 2018(?) and for some reason the charge was dismissed… on what grounds was it dismissed? and i believe he could still be charged by the state of California or another state so hopefully we will see that

edit: this section of reasons’ article summarizes the situation nicely.

“Now that Ulbricht has no chance of having his initial conviction and sentencing overturned or adjusted, it's likely the feds out of Maryland decided the indictment no longer was needed to make sure the government had some further means in their back pocket to punish Ulbricht for showing a safer, saner way around their insanely damaging drug war.”

the reason the charges were dismissed is similar to the reason he wasnt charged initially: because attempted murder charge was unnecessary from the prosecutors point if view. not because he is innocent of the charge. the article also notes that torture was an element in those murders. this guy should not be walking free

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. lupusr+362[view] [source] 2025-01-22 17:10:44
>>smeege+iE1
> the reason the charges were dismissed is similar to the reason he wasnt charged initially: because attempted murder charge was unnecessary from the prosecutors point if view

But why were the charges dismissed with prejudice? That's not the normal way to dismiss charges.

[go to top]