zlacker

[return to "Ross Ulbricht granted a full pardon"]
1. rappat+0c[view] [source] 2025-01-22 01:38:25
>>Ozarki+(OP)
I think his original sentence was absolutely deserved—even though the charge of hiring a contract killer to assassinate his business competition may have been dropped, I think it's clear he did many things in the same vein. Even if you support his original pursuit of a free and open online marketplace, I think most people would agree he took it a bridge too far in the end.

That said, I do think he absolutely deserved to be released, not because he didn't deserve to be locked up in the first place, but because he's clearly been rehabilitated and has done great work during his time in prison. All that considered, ten years seems like a not unreasonable prison sentence for what he did. I hope he'll continue to do good when he's released.

◧◩
2. naderm+sc[view] [source] 2025-01-22 01:41:37
>>rappat+0c
What has always sat odd with me regarding this, is we don't truly know the extent of the fbi's corruption in this. They stole, so it's not hard to imagine they planted evidence too.
◧◩◪
3. mplewi+Hc[view] [source] 2025-01-22 01:43:00
>>naderm+sc
What evidence would you have even needed to plant? He ran the largest internet drug market and openly tried to assassinate a competitor.
◧◩◪◨
4. TheAma+Tc[view] [source] 2025-01-22 01:44:36
>>mplewi+Hc
Agreed. He willingly engaged with the alleged hitman (which ended up being the FBI contact). He didn't need to do anything or not have the thought to murder others cross his mind.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. andirk+5i[view] [source] 2025-01-22 02:18:14
>>TheAma+Tc
Allegedly. The 2 rules of his Fight Club were no underage sex stuff and no physical harm. That hitman claim was not part of his charges or sentencing. The heavy sentencing was to like "send a message" the judge said.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. TheAma+Gi[view] [source] 2025-01-22 02:22:48
>>andirk+5i
They weren't part of his sentencing because a different court entirely was pursuing the hit for hire attempt charge, but because another court in NY got the book thrown at him for running the site, they decided to drop it because it didn't seem necessary anymore.

In hindsight, the prosecution probably wished they didn't do that, since they are said to have had overwhelming evidence and proof, and there is even a Wired article about chat logs pertaining to DPR seeking services, but those are the breaks! If you don't do your due diligence, criminals can be let off on a technicality too!

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. andirk+tj[view] [source] 2025-01-22 02:28:23
>>TheAma+Gi
I haven't looked into the case(s) for years, but prosecutors don't often just drop charges because other charges were found guilty. People get charged even after life sentences have been handed down.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. TheAma+2k[view] [source] 2025-01-22 02:31:47
>>andirk+tj
Perhaps. I can't think of why they ultimately decided not to move forward with it, but here we are.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
9. buckle+Up[view] [source] 2025-01-22 03:20:45
>>TheAma+2k
They dropped the murder for hire charges because discovery would have.. discovered the FBI doing very very bad things.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣▦
10. WrongA+kG[view] [source] 2025-01-22 06:09:51
>>buckle+Up
Prosecutors do not work for the FBI, and the FBI has no say in who gets prosecuted nor for which charges.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣▦▧
11. lupusr+Tc1[view] [source] 2025-01-22 11:30:08
>>WrongA+kG
Prosecutors work with, not for, law enforcement and generally do what they reasonably can to maintain a good "working relationship".
[go to top]