zlacker

[return to "Ross Ulbricht granted a full pardon"]
1. rappat+0c[view] [source] 2025-01-22 01:38:25
>>Ozarki+(OP)
I think his original sentence was absolutely deserved—even though the charge of hiring a contract killer to assassinate his business competition may have been dropped, I think it's clear he did many things in the same vein. Even if you support his original pursuit of a free and open online marketplace, I think most people would agree he took it a bridge too far in the end.

That said, I do think he absolutely deserved to be released, not because he didn't deserve to be locked up in the first place, but because he's clearly been rehabilitated and has done great work during his time in prison. All that considered, ten years seems like a not unreasonable prison sentence for what he did. I hope he'll continue to do good when he's released.

◧◩
2. naderm+sc[view] [source] 2025-01-22 01:41:37
>>rappat+0c
What has always sat odd with me regarding this, is we don't truly know the extent of the fbi's corruption in this. They stole, so it's not hard to imagine they planted evidence too.
◧◩◪
3. VWWHFS+re[view] [source] 2025-01-22 01:53:51
>>naderm+sc
Ross Ulbricht was not a good person. Full stop.

He organized and operated a global criminal drug ring and conspired to have people killed. The only difference between DPR and Pabla Escobar is that DPR was running his drug business in the 2010s instead of the 1980s.

◧◩◪◨
4. K0balt+yq[view] [source] 2025-01-22 03:27:16
>>VWWHFS+re
DPR dabbled with the idea of violence.

Pablo Escobar revelled in it.

PE put bombed newspapers and killed hundreds, if not thousands of people unrelated to any criminal enterprise or to arresting him. I mean, actual innocent, minding their own business civilians. Over 4000 murders have been directly attributed to the actions and orders of Escobar. Estimates to the actual count range closer to 8000.

DPR went over to the dark side a bit in that entrapment racket, or at least it seems so.

Thinking that someone needs to be murdered isn’t necessarily a character flaw, imho.

It depends on what DPR was led to believe about this fictional person. It is reasonable to imagine that the FBI took every possible measure to make their fake victim seem as murder worthy as possible. It’s not too much of a stretch to imagine that the “victim” may have been painted as a purveyor of child trafficking, CSAM, or other things repugnant. My point is we don’t know. And if we don’t know, we should reserve judgment.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. thruwa+Ws[view] [source] 2025-01-22 03:48:01
>>K0balt+yq
>DPR went over to the dark side a bit in that entrapment racket

It has to start somewhere

[go to top]