zlacker

[return to "Ross Ulbricht granted a full pardon"]
1. bdhcui+E9[view] [source] 2025-01-22 01:23:47
>>Ozarki+(OP)
Will he get his possesions back then?

50,676 bitcoins, today valued at 5,3 billion USD.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/us-attorney-announces-h...

◧◩
2. bb88+qb[view] [source] 2025-01-22 01:34:46
>>bdhcui+E9
If they were from the commission of a crime, then no.
◧◩◪
3. idlewo+Xd[view] [source] 2025-01-22 01:51:18
>>bb88+qb
It's a full pardon; there is no crime.
◧◩◪◨
4. Spooky+Mm[view] [source] 2025-01-22 02:52:56
>>idlewo+Xd
Pardons are forgiveness. They don’t roll back the clock, although the Supreme Court ruled in 2021 that acceptance of a pardon is not an assumption of guilt.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. ajcp+3p[view] [source] 2025-01-22 03:13:08
>>Spooky+Mm
Was acceptance of a pardon an "assumption" by the court? Is it not "admission* of guilt", which I believe itself was never the case as this was based on a judge's aside that people didn't accept pardons because it was *percieved* as "an admission of guilt", i.e. the "percieved" part was not actually articulated in court but rather the judge was completing a thought before it was fully articulated.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. Spooky+5s[view] [source] 2025-01-22 03:40:14
>>ajcp+3p
My apologies I made a mistake. The Burdick SCOTUS case from 1915 said “carries an imputation of guilt and acceptance of a confession of it”

In 2021, an appeals court opined that: “not every acceptance of a pardon constitutes a confession of guilt.”

I thought the 2021 case was a Supreme Court case, and I was incorrect. I think in the public eye the pardon is viewed differently based on however the story is told.

[go to top]