zlacker

[return to "Did Elon Musk Appear to Sieg Heil at Trump Inauguration?"]
1. johnet+e3[view] [source] 2025-01-20 21:20:06
>>sundae+(OP)
Why is this flagged? Surely one of the most influential people in the tech space (and the richest man in the world) doing a nazi salute is pertinent to Hacker News?
◧◩
2. dang+YE[view] [source] 2025-01-21 01:57:28
>>johnet+e3
Users flagged it.

See >>42775519 for more

◧◩◪
3. zfg+3S[view] [source] 2025-01-21 03:42:04
>>dang+YE
Can you unflag it? What Musk has done is not a small thing.

If Hacker News is about the tech industry then we need to see the tech industry clearly, warts and all.

We cannot run away from it. We cannot memory hole it.

◧◩◪◨
4. baseme+321[view] [source] 2025-01-21 05:38:21
>>zfg+3S
A large fraction of the folks here need this to be memory holed. Otherwise people will know how individuals on this forum stand on this issue.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. dang+T51[view] [source] 2025-01-21 06:30:40
>>baseme+321
HN commenters definitely aren't pro you-know-who on the whole; quite the opposite. (>>42776448 )

More importantly, the issue isn't whether people are boo or yay; it's that both the boo comments and the yay comments are repetitive, nasty, and boring...keeping in mind that something can be both boring and intense at the same time. Since that's what we're trying to avoid here, we should avoid it in this case as well.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. lazyst+OG2[view] [source] 2025-01-21 18:08:01
>>dang+T51
I 100% agree with your opinion that the top level comments would all be of a similar nature, but I think youre not considering how the thread comments would allow people to have a place to discuss what comes next, both for the nation and for the troll. It's a stunt clearly done to keep the executive orders out of the light, but unlike many of their previlus troll actions that had a similar goal, it's a stunt that will have long term implications.

The only other place to discuss it are the one million threads on reddit, where all the top level comments are bots. Again I agree with your points, but not your conclusion.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. dang+WJ2[view] [source] 2025-01-21 18:23:20
>>lazyst+OG2
There will be other articles that provide a better foundation to discuss that (i.e. "what comes next").

On HN the idea is we want some, but not too much, discussion of such issues, and for the discussion to be intellectually curious rather than flamingly indignant. For the first point to work, we can't have too many threads; and for the second to work, the threads we do have need to be based on more substantive articles (and events).

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. Teever+YN2[view] [source] 2025-01-21 18:47:01
>>dang+WJ2
I'd like to see a thread on hackernews that is something like this: https://old.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/1i6brqw/employee...

Do you consider this interpretation of the topic interesting and 'curious' enough for hackernews?

One of the main reasons that I come here is to interact with people in the tech industry and I think that the opinions of the people who work for the man or who have worked for the man about this event are important to hear.

[go to top]