zlacker

>>palata+(OP)
Just wanna say I can't understand Hacker News' stance on politics:

Someone posts Paul Graham's post talking about "woke" ideology and mods/admins do nothing about it

While this one stays flagged

At least be consistent

>>burger+ce
Just to be clear, there's one main mod (dang) and they don't flag submissions, that honour falls to regular users who've been here a year or three or more (whatever the time | point threshold is).

Most of the users that can [flag] also have the option to [vouch]. If enough vouch the flag is reveresed (as far as I know).

>>defros+cf
Dang has directly commented on this post now. He is upholding the flag, which makes him complicit.

>>Tadpol+rE
> Dang has directly commented on this post now.

Okay. He does comment most days.

> He is upholding the flag, ..

Is he? Like "actively" .. or just letting things work as they are designed and as HN users have made happen?

> which makes him complicit.

Does it?

If so, is there a legal path by which we can punish him for this?

Maybe you've invested a little to much of yourself in an online forum.