zlacker

[return to "United States Digital Service renamed to DOGE"]
1. w10-1+D2[view] [source] 2025-01-21 02:44:24
>>datadr+(OP)
The digital service did great work modernizing digital infrastructure of citizen-facing federal services.

AFAIK, it has *never* been stated publicly that DOGE or Mr. Musk would get control of this most essential service, responsible for sourcing identity verification, etc.

There's no relationship between bureaucracy efficiency efforts and the digital service. Indeed, one would have expected DOGE to be injected into the Office of Personnel Management.

It's disconcerting to see such a mismatch between rationale and deployment, particularly for a new agency with no oversight in Congress.

◧◩
2. purple+x5[view] [source] 2025-01-21 03:06:41
>>w10-1+D2
>AFAIK, it has never been stated publicly that DOGE or Mr. Musk would get control of this most essential service, responsible for sourcing identity verification, etc.

The man has been plotting on Signal with a bunch of cronies. Of course, he was never revealing his plans.

But, honestly, this makes perfect sense. USDS is an easy way for them to backdoor their way into the technology environment of the federal government on day 1. He gets a crew of talented people to report to him on day 1 who know the ins and outs as good as anyone in the federal government.

On top of that, after 4 years, they can tout all the successes of DOGE. Hell, they might even claim it saved Healthcare.gov

◧◩◪
3. alexos+d6[view] [source] 2025-01-21 03:12:21
>>purple+x5
It does make sense on paper, but I wonder how effective they will be. USDS never really controlled much (at least when I was there). It was much more about soft power, connecting disparate efforts, establishing best practices, boosting other teams when needed.

The idea that it's a backdoor to government technology is something that an outsider would think. For the record this also happened eight years ago when Jared Kushner tried to put his tennis buddy in charge.

[go to top]