zlacker

[return to "The Origins of Wokeness"]
1. bachme+eY1[view] [source] 2025-01-13 21:49:03
>>crbela+(OP)
You can tell who a person does and doesn't talk with when reading something like this. To write an essay of this length, on this topic, and not bring up (at a minimum) Jerry Falwell and the Moral Majority suggests you shouldn't be writing about it.

I was a college student in the 1990s. Not only that, I was a member and even leader of evangelical Christian groups in college. Outrage, us versus them, claims of being persecuted, and imposing standards of morality on others was the reason those groups existed. The bigger the fight you started, the better.

This is like writing an essay criticizing WalMart for paying low wages when every competing business pays the same or lower wages. Not false, but definitely not the whole truth, and obviously misleading.

◧◩
2. freeti+5W2[view] [source] 2025-01-14 04:22:14
>>bachme+eY1
Graham doesn't mention Jerry Falwell and the Moral Majority by name, but he does explicitly compare wokeness to religion:

> Previous generations of prigs had been prigs mostly about religion and sex.

> Is there a simple, principled way to deal with wokeness? I think there is: to use the customs we already have for dealing with religion. Wokeness is effectively a religion, just with God replaced by protected classes.

I think it's abundantly clear that he does not condone priggishness whether it's coming from the right or the left.

> and not bring up (at a minimum) Jerry Falwell and the Moral Majority suggests you shouldn't be writing about it.

I think it's fine to point out that there are parallels on the right. But I don't think it is constructive to say that he is not entitled to write about a topic just because he doesn't explicitly mention something that you think is important.

◧◩◪
3. n4r9+Tr3[view] [source] 2025-01-14 10:00:39
>>freeti+5W2
> it's abundantly clear that he does not condone priggishness whether it's coming from the right or the left

He tacitly condones Musk, whose priggishness currently consists of smugly rehashing alt-right talking points.

[go to top]