zlacker

[return to "The Origins of Wokeness"]
1. malcol+fa1[view] [source] 2025-01-13 18:30:32
>>crbela+(OP)
[flagged]
◧◩
2. runjak+rb1[view] [source] 2025-01-13 18:36:33
>>malcol+fa1
Do you have any points of substance you can elaborate with? I would genuinely like to hear your argument.
◧◩◪
3. e_i_pi+1h1[view] [source] 2025-01-13 19:01:05
>>runjak+rb1
Not OP, but personally it's just sad to see someone that you view as a historically great mind getting distracted by nonsense, like if a great mathematician suddenly stopped their research to focus on flat earth and contrails
◧◩◪◨
4. diggan+Fi1[view] [source] 2025-01-13 19:07:04
>>e_i_pi+1h1
> view as a historically great mind getting distracted by nonsense

Are you saying that thinking about "wokeness" is a distraction, regardless of the person? Or that specifically PG thinking about "wokeness" is a distraction? Or maybe even "thinking about wokeness in that way" is the distraction?

It seems like if "wokeness" is important, then having more people thinking about it is better, regardless of their outcome from thinking about it. If "wokeness" isn't important at all, I'd totally understand you, but seems there are way more people out there thinking about it more than PG, since it's the first time I see him say anything about it at all.

[go to top]