zlacker

>>senkor+(OP)
> Of course, here it is ten years later, and the guy in charge just sent it back fifty years. Way to upstage me, dude.

I feel like there's a link to a story missing there

>>wodeno+RG4
It's about the company's recent course change, which includes Zuckerberg's Joe Rogan interview from last week. IMO this has a lot to do with the younger generations. Gen Z were heavily supporting Trump in the recent election, and Zuck has probably realised that he needs to align Meta with them if they want to remain a relevant player in the social media space.

>>this_u+SH6
Right wing streamers who are not part of Fox themselves put two and two together and came up with section 230.

They even said that Trump could threaten Facebook with specifically removing protections for the platform, and then turn around and not do it: resulting in damage to the platform without having to do anything.

I think everyone knows why Zuck is doing it. If there were any other republican government, the capitulation wouldn’t be this abject.