zlacker

[return to "I deleted my social media accounts"]
1. bflesc+34[view] [source] 2025-01-12 22:53:51
>>joeman+(OP)
I wouldn't delete social media accounts because they might become available to register for malicious actors who can then impersonate you. Keep the accounts, just don't use them any more.
◧◩
2. atrett+W5[view] [source] 2025-01-12 23:08:59
>>bflesc+34
There isn't anything unique about your account on most social media platforms. This isn't a "plant your flag" situation like when trying to prevent identity theft. You don't need to register your account before a bad actor does. Sure, I created an online account with the IRS, credit bureaus, etc. before somebody else could. That's important because they are tied to unique identifiers like your SSN, etc. But somebody could just create a social media account impersonating you even if you already have an account on that social network. There isn't anything enforcing the uniqueness.
◧◩◪
3. matthe+07[view] [source] 2025-01-12 23:15:59
>>atrett+W5
My Twitter account has 140K+ followers and impersonators keep making copies that they use for cryptocurrency scams. So that's why I'm personally a little sensitive to deleting it, even if I've mostly committed to leaving that hellhole.
◧◩◪◨
4. angora+g9[view] [source] 2025-01-12 23:28:22
>>matthe+07
What does keeping the account actually do to prevent scamming? They’re going to scam regardless.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. johnny+Ma[view] [source] 2025-01-12 23:38:56
>>angora+g9
That's pretty much the only upside to that blue checkmark these days. Making anyone able to buy one was a huge mistake, but they will at least do the minium check to see if someone else with that name already has a checkmark.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. angora+ud[view] [source] 2025-01-13 00:04:48
>>johnny+Ma
Will they? I'd actually be surprised if there are many people that, upon receiving a suspicious message from someone who claims to be Joe Schmoe, will actually go and check to see if a different account from Joe Schmoe with a blue check. I think it's much more likely that they're either going to recognize it as a scam right away, or they won't and they'll fall for it. In either of those cases, it doesn't help for the blue-checkmark-holder to keep their account.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. johnny+tA[view] [source] 2025-01-13 03:39:45
>>angora+ud
There will always be someone falling for scams. No amount of safeguards will protect them if they do zero due diligence and the scammer is persistent enough. The checkmark isn't an end-all-be-all, but it's another small step someone can use to verify without too much hassle.

also, I just noticed "they" is ambiguous here. I meant "the twitter staff giving checkmarks". At least I hope they do some basic check before handing out a checkmark to an obvious impersonator.

[go to top]