zlacker

[return to "Be a property owner and not a renter on the internet"]
1. rpcope+9j[view] [source] 2025-01-03 04:07:47
>>dend+(OP)
> Exploiting user-generated content.

You know, if I've noticed anything in the past couple years, it's that even if you self-host your own site, it's still going to get hoovered up and used/exploited by things like AI training bots. I think between everyone's code getting trained on, even if it's AGPLv3 or something similarly restrictive, and generally everything public on the internet getting "trained" and "transformed" to basically launder it via "AI", I can absolutely see why someone rational would want to share a whole lot less, anywhere, in an open fashion, regardless of where it's hosted.

I'd honestly rather see and think more about how to segment communities locally, and go back to the "fragmented" way things once were. It's easier to want to share with other real people than inadvertently working for free to enrich companies.

◧◩
2. foxgla+IG1[view] [source] 2025-01-03 17:29:44
>>rpcope+9j
What is your purpose of publishing where having the content used to train AI is a problem? Are you trying to gatekeep information that's not even protected by copyright anyway? Are you worried your potential audience will get the same thing (including your personal creativity) from AI that just copied your work so they don't recognize your name and develop some brand awareness? Or do you just not like AI and don't want to help it? Maybe you could build your own paywall or other technical access restriction instead of making it freely available? Even just a captcha should block AI training scrapers, shouldn't it?
◧◩◪
3. asdff+UG1[view] [source] 2025-01-03 17:30:29
>>foxgla+IG1
No attribution with ai
◧◩◪◨
4. foxgla+uE2[view] [source] 2025-01-04 01:15:18
>>asdff+UG1
But also no direct copying, typically. Would OP really be happy with an AI that reliably rewords everything so that attribution is not required but still reproduces the information?
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. rchaud+MX3[view] [source] 2025-01-04 17:50:45
>>foxgla+uE2
Human educational systems penalize you for not citing sources (i.e. not showing your work, not crediting referenced works). Why should an AI system be exempt?
[go to top]