zlacker

[return to "Lfgss shutting down 16th March 2025 (day before Online Safety Act is enforced)"]
1. Markus+6j[view] [source] 2024-12-16 19:11:45
>>buro9+(OP)
Is there some generalized law (yet) about unintended consequences? For example:

Increase fuel economy -> Introduce fuel economy standards -> Economic cars practically phased out in favour of guzzling "trucks" that are exempt from fuel economy standards -> Worse fuel economy.

or

Protect the children -> Criminalize activites that might in any way cause an increase in risk to children -> Best to just keep them indoors playing with electronic gadgets -> Increased rates of obesity/depression etc -> Children worse off.

As the article itself says: Hold big tech accountable -> Introduce rules so hard to comply with that only big tech will be able to comply -> Big tech goes on, but indie tech forced offline.

◧◩
2. humodz+Tu[view] [source] 2024-12-16 20:18:39
>>Markus+6j
There's the Cobra Effect popularized by Freakonomics

Too many cobras > bounty for slain cobras > people start breeding them for the bounty > law is revoked > people release their cobras > even more cobras around

◧◩◪
3. dredmo+KQ1[view] [source] 2024-12-17 10:33:47
>>humodz+Tu
The Freakonomics coverage was based on the book The Great Hanoi Rat Hunt by Michael G. Vann.

He was recently interviewed about that book on the New Books Network:

<https://newbooksnetwork.com/michael-g-vann-the-great-hanoi-r...>

Audio: <https://traffic.megaphone.fm/LIT1560680456.mp3> (mp3)

(Episode begins at 1:30.)

Among the interesting revelations: the rat problem was concentrated in the French Quarter of Hanoi, as that's where the sewerage system was developed. What drained away filth also provided an express subway for rats. Which had been brought to Vietnam by steamship-powered trade, for what it's worth.

(That's only a few minutes into the interview. The whole episode is great listening, and includes a few details on the Freakonomics experience.)

◧◩◪◨
4. dredmo+9x3[view] [source] 2024-12-17 23:36:41
>>dredmo+KQ1
Correction: Both the Freakonomics coverage and the book named above were based on an earlier paper, though both that and the book were by Vann.
[go to top]