zlacker

>>buro9+(OP)
The actual OfCom code of practice is here: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/onli...

A cycling site with 275k MAU would be in the very lowest category where compliance is things like 'having a content moderation function to review and assess suspected illegal content'. So having a report button.

>>owisd+uv
This: OP seems to be throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

Im surprised they don’t already have some form of report/flag button.

>>orf+Dw
I’m not so sure. It’s a layman’s interpretation, but I think any “forum” would be multi-risk.

That means you need to do CSAM scanning if you accept images, CSAM URL scanning if you accept links, and there’s a lot more than that to parse here.

>>codazo+5G
That scanning requirement only applies if your site is:

• A "large service" (more than 7 million monthly active UK users) that is at a medium or high risk of image-based CSAM, or

• A service that is at a high risk of image-based CSAM and either has more than 700000 monthly active UK users or is a file-storage and file-sharing service.