zlacker

>>buro9+(OP)
Have you considered handing off the forums to someone based outside of the UK? I'm sure you might be able to find a reasonable steward and divest without leaving your users stranded. You've worked very hard and have something to be proud of, I would hate to see it go.

>>soulof+4S
"The Act applies to services even if the companies providing them are outside the UK should they have links to the UK. This includes if the service has a significant number of UK users"

>>dutchb+TM1
>"...This includes if the service has a significant number of UK users".

"[A] significant number"? How Britishly vague.

There was one person involved in the doompf of that ceo guy....

I would say that a significant-sized football crowd would be over 75,000.

That's a lot of numbers that 'significant', has to lean on.

>>Ylpert+PO1
> The subsection headed ‘User numbers’ (which begins at paragraph 5.7) explains when a service is to be treated as having more than a particular number of monthly active United Kingdom users for those measures which apply in relation to services of a certain size, and how to calculate the number of monthly active United Kingdom users. The definition of ‘large service’ is included in the definitions section in Section 5 of this document.

That section details how to calculate the figures, because they're relevant for sections like CSAM scanning

> Services that are at high risk of imagebased CSAM and (a) have more than 700,000 monthly active United Kingdom users or (b) are file-storage and file-sharing services.