zlacker

[return to "Lfgss shutting down 16th March 2025 (day before Online Safety Act is enforced)"]
1. owisd+uv[view] [source] 2024-12-16 20:23:17
>>buro9+(OP)
The actual OfCom code of practice is here: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/onli...

A cycling site with 275k MAU would be in the very lowest category where compliance is things like 'having a content moderation function to review and assess suspected illegal content'. So having a report button.

◧◩
2. orf+Dw[view] [source] 2024-12-16 20:29:35
>>owisd+uv
This: OP seems to be throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

Im surprised they don’t already have some form of report/flag button.

◧◩◪
3. codazo+5G[view] [source] 2024-12-16 21:29:01
>>orf+Dw
I’m not so sure. It’s a layman’s interpretation, but I think any “forum” would be multi-risk.

That means you need to do CSAM scanning if you accept images, CSAM URL scanning if you accept links, and there’s a lot more than that to parse here.

◧◩◪◨
4. threes+E41[view] [source] 2024-12-17 00:47:44
>>codazo+5G
> do CSAM scanning if you accept images, CSAM URL scanning if you accept links

Which really should be happening anyway.

I would strongly prefer that forums I visit not expose me to child pornography.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. scotty+Z22[view] [source] 2024-12-17 12:45:03
>>threes+E41
> I would strongly prefer that forums I visit not expose me to child pornography.

While almost everybody including me shares this perference maybe it should be something that browsers could do? After all why put the burden on countless various websites if you can implement it in a single piece of software?

This could also make it easier to go after people who are sources of such material because it wouldn't immediately disappear from the network often without a trace.

[go to top]