zlacker

[return to "Lfgss shutting down 16th March 2025 (day before Online Safety Act is enforced)"]
1. Markus+6j[view] [source] 2024-12-16 19:11:45
>>buro9+(OP)
Is there some generalized law (yet) about unintended consequences? For example:

Increase fuel economy -> Introduce fuel economy standards -> Economic cars practically phased out in favour of guzzling "trucks" that are exempt from fuel economy standards -> Worse fuel economy.

or

Protect the children -> Criminalize activites that might in any way cause an increase in risk to children -> Best to just keep them indoors playing with electronic gadgets -> Increased rates of obesity/depression etc -> Children worse off.

As the article itself says: Hold big tech accountable -> Introduce rules so hard to comply with that only big tech will be able to comply -> Big tech goes on, but indie tech forced offline.

◧◩
2. FredPr+Mo[view] [source] 2024-12-16 19:44:14
>>Markus+6j
Politicians should take a mandatory one-week training in:

- very basic macro economics

- very basic game theory

- very basic statistics

Come to think of it, kids should learn this in high school

◧◩◪
3. wat100+jx[view] [source] 2024-12-16 20:33:50
>>FredPr+Mo
I think you’re being overly charitable in thinking this happens because they don’t understand these things. The main thing is that they don’t care. The purpose of passing legislation to protect the children isn’t to protect the children, it’s to get reelected.

If we can get the voters to understand the things you mention, then maybe we’d have a chance.

◧◩◪◨
4. threes+I31[view] [source] 2024-12-17 00:37:43
>>wat100+jx
> protect the children isn’t to protect the children, it’s to get reelected

The next UK general election is ~5 years away so this makes no sense.

The more likely reason is that it's simply good policy. We have enough research now that shows that (a) social media use is harmful for children and (b) social media companies like Meta, TikTok etc have done a wilfully poor job at protecting them.

It is bizarre to me how many people here seem willing to defend them.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. wat100+P71[view] [source] 2024-12-17 01:16:27
>>threes+I31
Does British campaigning not look very far into the past? In the US, an opposing candidate would absolutely say “the incumbent voted against the protect-children-from-online-predators act five years ago, don’t reelect them, vote for me” and it would be effective.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. gbuk20+AP1[view] [source] 2024-12-17 10:19:13
>>wat100+P71
LOL what campaigning? A couple of weeks before the election I get a few leaflets through my door with a few paragraphs about some person I never heard of and maybe some bullet points. People just pick political party and then vote for whoever has their logo next to the name.
[go to top]