zlacker

[return to "Lfgss shutting down 16th March 2025 (day before Online Safety Act is enforced)"]
1. owisd+uv[view] [source] 2024-12-16 20:23:17
>>buro9+(OP)
The actual OfCom code of practice is here: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/onli...

A cycling site with 275k MAU would be in the very lowest category where compliance is things like 'having a content moderation function to review and assess suspected illegal content'. So having a report button.

◧◩
2. orf+Dw[view] [source] 2024-12-16 20:29:35
>>owisd+uv
This: OP seems to be throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

Im surprised they don’t already have some form of report/flag button.

◧◩◪
3. iLoveO+hI[view] [source] 2024-12-16 21:44:22
>>orf+Dw
OP isn't throwing the baby with the bathwater and he explains it very well in his post: the risk of being sued is too great in itself, even if you end up winning the lawsuit.
◧◩◪◨
4. dangus+WX[view] [source] 2024-12-16 23:38:48
>>iLoveO+hI
The general risk of being sued is always there regardless of the various things laws say.

I think there’s a pretty decent argument being made here that OP is reading too far in the new rules and letting the worst case scenario get in the way of something they’re passionate about.

I wonder if they consulted with a lawyer before making this decision? That’s what I would be doing.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. mmmore+Yu1[view] [source] 2024-12-17 06:19:10
>>dangus+WX
Given:

> I do so philanthropically without any profit motive (typically losing money)

the cost (and hassle) of consulting with a lawyer is potentially a lot in relative terms.

That said, I thought that the rule in the UK was generally that the loser pays the winners costs, so I'd think that limit the costs of defending truly frivolous suits. The downside risks are possibly still high though.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. tinbuc+6M1[view] [source] 2024-12-17 09:40:31
>>mmmore+Yu1
> That said, I thought that the rule in the UK was generally that the loser pays the winners costs

That’s generally true… but only happens after those costs have been incurred and probably paid.

There’s no guarantee the party suing will be able to cover their own costs and the defendant’s costs. That leaves OP on the hook for defence costs with the hope that they might get them back after a successful and likely expensive defence.

In that situation, I can understand why OP wouldn’t want to take the risk.

[go to top]