zlacker

>>bewal4+(OP)
The website http://astronaut.io/ does a similar thing but for recent videos, and not just from iPhones. From the home page:

> These videos come from YouTube. They were uploaded in the last week and have titles like DSC 1234 and IMG 4321. They have almost zero previous views. They are unnamed, unedited, and unseen (by anyone but you).

At one point you might be at a school recital in Malaysia, and the next minute you are at a birthday in Ecuador. It's amazing!

>>mastaz+f3
http://www.insecam.org/ is another fun one. Random unsecured security cameras from around the world.

>>rwmj+ge1
This site has the cookie permissions dialog which has "reject all", but I think this rejects only the "opt-in" cookies.

The "legitimate interest" cookies, which are equally comprehensive but are on a different tab, are not rejected by this, and to reject them you have to turn each one of them off by hand, scrolling down a massive list.

If you select "reject all", the dialog instantly closes, I think with the legitimate interest cookies all in use - but I can't check, because I know of no way to get the dialog back up again, which is why I'm saying "I think".

When sites pop this one up, I leave - and notably, The Register, the UK news site, started using it a year or so ago.

>>casenm+RB1
I think usually the standard wording for this option would be something like "Reject all non-essential cookies" and they left out the second part of that sentence. I'm not saying it's OK but maybe it's a mistake that was done in good faith.

>>mastaz+HA2
GP is alluding to the fact that several tracking networks will place their cookies in the "legitimate interest" category, because the rationale is that them making money by monetizing user data is their "legitimate" moneymaking interest.

There's not a lot of good faith in that, and it's arguably not valid according to GDPR.