zlacker

[return to "Language is not essential for the cognitive processes that underlie thought"]
1. fnordp+8i4[view] [source] 2024-10-19 03:16:43
>>orcul+(OP)
For those who can’t and don’t think in words this is unsurprising.
◧◩
2. Razeng+Bq5[view] [source] 2024-10-19 18:49:30
>>fnordp+8i4
Can you count without using a "language"?

Try it now: Tap your hand on the desk randomly. Can you recall how many times you did it without "saying" a sequence in your head like "1, 2, 3" or "A, B, C" etc?

If yes, how far can you count? With a language it's effectively infinite. You could theoretically go up to "1 million 5 hundred 43 thousand, 2 hundred and 10" and effortlessly know what comes next.

◧◩◪
3. j_bum+Pr5[view] [source] 2024-10-19 18:59:13
>>Razeng+Bq5
This is highly anecdotal, but when I lift weights, I have an “intuition” about the number of reps I’ve performed without consciously counting them.

An example of this would be when I’m lifting weights with a friend and am lost in the set/focusing on mind-muscle connection, and as a result I forget to count my reps. I am usually quite accurate when I verify with my lifting partner the number of reps done/remaining.

As OP mentioned, many people have no internal speech, otherwise known as anendophasia, yet can still do everything anyone with an internal dialogue can do.

Similarly for me, I can do “mental object rotation” tasks even though I have aphantasia.

[go to top]