zlacker

[return to "Rama on Clojure's terms, and the magic of continuation-passing style"]
1. kamma4+QJ[view] [source] 2024-10-14 11:24:05
>>nathan+(OP)
I don’t want to be a party pooper, but from my very cursory look at the page, I don’t think this will go much farther than a very small community. I feel like you’re adding a lot of complexity compared to normal backhand/frontend/websetvices Scenario that everybody already understand.
◧◩
2. diggan+CN[view] [source] 2024-10-14 12:02:59
>>kamma4+QJ
With that mindset, should we just stop trying to improve anything regarding backend/frontend/webservices since "everybody already understand it"?
◧◩◪
3. jgalt2+QP[view] [source] 2024-10-14 12:21:45
>>diggan+CN
You're arguing change (a broadly defined term) is not necessarily bad, but the OP is arguing adding complexity (a type of change) is bad.
[go to top]