zlacker

[return to "Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics"]
1. Random+hPb[view] [source] 2024-09-13 11:18:00
>>mef+(OP)
What I find fascinating/disturbing with OnlyFans and in some way with Twitch and streaming in general is more the client side than the creators. Here are basically people paying, and paying a lot, for parasocial relationships. Because clearly it’s not about the content per see which is a dim a dozen and available for free in trove.

I think it says something quite dark about our society as a whole that we have basically commoditised distress and are encouraging some people often themselves in dire circumstances to prey on others to the benefits of the middle men. I find these new pimps scarier than the old sort in that they pretend to have clean hands.

◧◩
2. qingch+Skc[view] [source] 2024-09-13 15:21:24
>>Random+hPb
This view isn't matched by the stats. I have a friend who is a successful OF model and only a fraction of one percent of her subscribers ever DM her. A lot of them subscribe, see what they want and then immediately delete their accounts. There's no apparent relationship between her fans and her, for the most part.
◧◩◪
3. ehnto+Umc[view] [source] 2024-09-13 15:35:42
>>qingch+Skc
Parasocial relationships don't require interaction, you could just watch a twitch streamer a lot. I think if we defined it by requiring interaction we would underestimate the percieved impact of these social phenomenon.
◧◩◪◨
4. mudita+doc[view] [source] 2024-09-13 15:43:36
>>ehnto+Umc
It not only doesn’t require interaction, the lack of interaction is what makes is parasocial.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. jayd16+rrc[view] [source] 2024-09-13 16:02:39
>>mudita+doc
So like, movies are more para social because they have less interaction?
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. squeak+zKc[view] [source] 2024-09-13 18:12:46
>>jayd16+rrc
You can like Ryan Gosling and catch every movie he's in. But if you're buying a tabloid so you can see photos of him getting coffee at Starbucks, that's parasocial.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. GuB-42+KUc[view] [source] 2024-09-13 19:22:17
>>squeak+zKc
It is also parasocial if you just like Ryan Gosling and watch all his movies. You still have one-way feelings for a personality. It is just that it is not pathological.

Parasocial relationships are not bad per se. Let's say you are thinking about Donald Knuth when working on a computer science problem, nothing bad here, taking inspiration from the leaders in the field. But it is also a parasocial relationship, it is like imagining Don Knuth next to you, helping you solve your problem, even though he has absolutely no idea about who you are. It is a one way connection, but here, it is actually productive.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. chgs+Gde[view] [source] 2024-09-14 12:10:41
>>GuB-42+KUc
There’s no neat boundaries - read a Ryan gosling autobiography. How about an autobiography of Einstein. Or a biography? What about watching a film of a historical figure? Do I have a parasocial relationship with Anne Boleyn because I saw Six?

If you’re ignoring the “believe you have a two way relationship” then everything could be defined as parasocial.

[go to top]