zlacker

[return to "Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics"]
1. Random+hPb[view] [source] 2024-09-13 11:18:00
>>mef+(OP)
What I find fascinating/disturbing with OnlyFans and in some way with Twitch and streaming in general is more the client side than the creators. Here are basically people paying, and paying a lot, for parasocial relationships. Because clearly it’s not about the content per see which is a dim a dozen and available for free in trove.

I think it says something quite dark about our society as a whole that we have basically commoditised distress and are encouraging some people often themselves in dire circumstances to prey on others to the benefits of the middle men. I find these new pimps scarier than the old sort in that they pretend to have clean hands.

◧◩
2. makeit+JXb[view] [source] 2024-09-13 12:34:19
>>Random+hPb
> Because clearly it’s not about the content per see which is a dim a dozen and available for free in trove.

I think you should step back and look at it with a bit of distance. Is the content they're paying for really the same as you think is available for free, and do they even get it under the same conditions, in morality and circumstance.

Not knowing your life, it feels like you could have said the same towards people buying pricy concert tickets when there's royalty free music abundantly available.

> commoditised distress [...] often in dire situations

The first step to alleviate these specific situations could be to stop marginalizing this kind of content and give them a regular professional status, instead of systematicly pigeon hole it.

◧◩◪
3. Secret+lZb[view] [source] 2024-09-13 12:45:52
>>makeit+JXb
But the OP is right about the parasocial aspect. OF content and other such platforms is about the personalization aspect. Sure, there's some kinks/fetishes too.. but it is primarily about engagement. In some ways, it's just an explicit, subscription based, social media platform where it feels like you're being treated uniquely... But most times you are not.
◧◩◪◨
4. itisha+91c[view] [source] 2024-09-13 12:58:59
>>Secret+lZb
How is that particularly different from, say, concerts? The social aspects are what drives value.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. flying+eac[view] [source] 2024-09-13 14:05:44
>>itisha+91c
I don't know about you, but I also find concerts very strange and off putting. Like, is "Denver" really a special crowd? I'm pretty sure you are doing a very staged reppeded performance but making us think its specially for us.

I like things without crowd interaction, like musicals/plays, because there is no dystopian parasocial aspect to it. I am only there because the live is different than the recording.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. grvbck+N5d[view] [source] 2024-09-13 20:47:32
>>flying+eac
> Like, is "Denver" really a special crowd?

As someone who frequently goes to concerts, I can absolutely testify that the audience can vary a lot between cities. You can usually tell if the band/artist is genuinly enjoying their performance or if they are doing the bare rehearsed minimum.

If you read/watch interviews with touring musicians, all have stories about how "Tokyo was crazy", "London was boring" etc – even though the set list was the exact same every evening.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. julien+rdd[view] [source] 2024-09-13 21:40:09
>>grvbck+N5d
Concerts can be magical and unique.

https://youtu.be/qtR5L-RGKgw?si=BNdfle2M1cxXlR9A&t=357

[go to top]