zlacker

>>mef+(OP)
So this is a VC writing, observing that they have a stable, profitable business model. Creators get 80% of revenue, which is pretty good. It creates a moat - nobody taking a bigger cut is likely to get the desirable talent. Most of the creators don't make much, which is normal for creative industries. Music and books work that way.

OnlyFans has only about 42 employees. They didn't hire a bloated staff. That's impressive considering the sheer volume of content that passes through their servers.

It looks like OnlyFans has figured out how to do the porno business in a more or less legit way. So what's the problem?

>>Animat+QQc
problem? ball seems to approve, terming it 'stunning', 'probably the most successful uk company founded since deepmind', 'the most significant media platform founded since tiktok', and says that on onlyfans 'creators and pornstars alike can make more money, in a safer way, while having greater autonomy and offering audiences experiences that feel more authentic, differentiated, and valuable'

were you replying to someone else making a comment attacking onlyfans?