zlacker

[return to "Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics"]
1. Random+hPb[view] [source] 2024-09-13 11:18:00
>>mef+(OP)
What I find fascinating/disturbing with OnlyFans and in some way with Twitch and streaming in general is more the client side than the creators. Here are basically people paying, and paying a lot, for parasocial relationships. Because clearly it’s not about the content per see which is a dim a dozen and available for free in trove.

I think it says something quite dark about our society as a whole that we have basically commoditised distress and are encouraging some people often themselves in dire circumstances to prey on others to the benefits of the middle men. I find these new pimps scarier than the old sort in that they pretend to have clean hands.

◧◩
2. paxys+vZb[view] [source] 2024-09-13 12:47:24
>>Random+hPb
It's way worse in the case of YouTube/Twitch than OnlyFans IMO. People have been paying for pornography/sex for millennia. It's just part of human nature. On the other hand an 11 year old throwing money at MrBeast...why?
◧◩◪
3. BeefWe+48c[view] [source] 2024-09-13 13:50:29
>>paxys+vZb
Same reason why kids have paid for Transformers merch, Star Wars merch, band merch, etc.

It's a brand, they like it, they want to be reminded of it and show their love of it off. It creates an "in group" which is socially valuable. Streamers are nothing special in that regard.

◧◩◪◨
4. foursi+lgc[view] [source] 2024-09-13 14:51:14
>>BeefWe+48c
There is an important difference between a kid spending money on a toy versus spending it on a person.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. BeefWe+K4d[view] [source] 2024-09-13 20:38:36
>>foursi+lgc
I'm not talking about toys, though I'd argue they're much the same.

I'm talking backpacks, lunch boxes, t-shirts, hats, etc. You know, merch.

[go to top]