zlacker

[return to "Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics"]
1. Random+hPb[view] [source] 2024-09-13 11:18:00
>>mef+(OP)
What I find fascinating/disturbing with OnlyFans and in some way with Twitch and streaming in general is more the client side than the creators. Here are basically people paying, and paying a lot, for parasocial relationships. Because clearly it’s not about the content per see which is a dim a dozen and available for free in trove.

I think it says something quite dark about our society as a whole that we have basically commoditised distress and are encouraging some people often themselves in dire circumstances to prey on others to the benefits of the middle men. I find these new pimps scarier than the old sort in that they pretend to have clean hands.

◧◩
2. derdi+ZHc[view] [source] 2024-09-13 17:53:28
>>Random+hPb
> [...] for parasocial relationships. Because clearly it’s not about the content per see which is a dim a dozen and available for free in trove.

I think you're making assumptions about people's motivations that aren't consistent with evidence.

Pornhub and similar sites are full of content that is a dime a dozen and available for free and does not suggest any kind of "parasocial" relationship with the viewer. It's just two or more people fucking. And it's the same as it was ten years ago. And yet... More of that content keeps being made. Porn production companies exist. Pornstars making money for fucking on camera exist. Clearly there are people willing to pay for new porn that will just end up on free-to-view sites anyway.

Your mental model of "it's all about the parasocial relationship" doesn't explain these facts. Thus your mental model can't be the whole truth. I suspect it's at most a fairly small part of the truth.

[go to top]