zlacker

[return to "Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics"]
1. listle+Wjb[view] [source] 2024-09-13 05:05:45
>>mef+(OP)
Is anyone willing to admit they subscribe to an OF and explain why over the free pornography alternatives that most of the internet is full of?
◧◩
2. yieldc+rqc[view] [source] 2024-09-13 15:57:15
>>listle+Wjb
Four years after the pandemic and people still pretend not to know that onlyfans is often free? Its such a tired trope to debate, but there is the possibility you’re serious

The article itself explains how subscriptions are a low part of OnlyFans business

But maybe this is only offering a glimpse

Many successful creators have a marketing strategy that includes a free subscription tier, and make money in pay per view DMs, or charging for DMs at all

So for people browsing for free pornography, its the same or better

Either way, its nice to see your attractive friends naked. Many women you meet in real life have a link in their social media bio that includes their onlyfans. In my world its very predictable based on visual attractiveness. Astoundingly, often it seems other women in their friend groups don’t know this and haven’t checked the “link in bio” of their girl friends. This masquerades as acceptance of sex workers.

[go to top]