zlacker

[return to "Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics"]
1. braza+3yb[view] [source] 2024-09-13 08:01:23
>>mef+(OP)
Not a moralistic take, but one issue that interests me is the second-order impacts associated with the long tail of producers in OF who do not make a career from it.

With traditional adult entertainment, creators are aware of the social ramifications (e.g., social stigma, familial ostracism, difficulty dealing with the future, and so on), and there is a decent theoretical economic framework to measure that.

I am not sure if there's the same this new army of "civilians" joining OF, let alone the additional toll it will take on the creators in terms of social ostracism, future prospects, future opportunities, and mental health.

◧◩
2. bool3m+8zb[view] [source] 2024-09-13 08:15:05
>>braza+3yb
That issue exists in the context of all other novel "social media" careers as well.
◧◩◪
3. tessie+HDb[view] [source] 2024-09-13 09:00:02
>>bool3m+8zb
not to the extent of having a video published where you have sex - to put it mildly.
◧◩◪◨
4. debesy+JKb[view] [source] 2024-09-13 10:26:03
>>tessie+HDb
Yeah but having sex on tape isn't something special or shameful.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. beagle+4Lb[view] [source] 2024-09-13 10:31:21
>>debesy+JKb
If you take a video of taking a shit mostly no one is gonna think you're immoral or shameful but if there's videos plastered everywhere of you shitting on cam for cash then it could be detrimental to your social standing.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. debesy+ZMb[view] [source] 2024-09-13 10:53:48
>>beagle+4Lb
I would argue that video of taking a shit could display video production and marketing skills better than, let's say, doing a socially unacceptable political rant.

But I agree that probabbly being super racist is currently more accepted in some social media than showing genitals. I'm not promoting it, of course.

[go to top]