zlacker

[return to "Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content"]
1. object+sS[view] [source] 2024-08-27 16:20:43
>>southe+(OP)
It's funny because Facebook's news feed in the last couple years is unusable, filled with AI slop and clickbait. Twitter similarly requires aggressive use of block + mute to eliminate scams, clickbait, and other content I'm not interested in.

I don't know if this is due to their changes in moderation policy, or if AI has overwhelmed them, but I vastly preferred the old news feeds

◧◩
2. silver+R21[view] [source] 2024-08-27 17:00:42
>>object+sS
A few years back it started showing me obvious political ragebait. I ignored it and then it started showing me pictures of women whose nipples were obviously showing through their clothing, which was an improvement, but still not the reason I signed up for Facebook. I've always understood it as the algorithm is looking for engagement and will try some lowest common denominator tactics to engage in it. As someone who just wanted to see the odd picture of a friend or relative, I don't have much use for Facebook these days.
◧◩◪
3. rnd0+3k1[view] [source] 2024-08-27 18:23:02
>>silver+R21
>A few years back it started showing me obvious political ragebait. I ignored it and then it started showing me pictures of women whose nipples were obviously showing through their clothing, which was an improvement, but still not the reason I signed up for Facebook.

Same experience. Then, after ignoring that, I've started getting posts from mystery people who seem like they could be aquaintences (because hobbies) but aren't -an improvement, but still off the mark.

I just want to go back to where you could use facebook to share what you're up to and see what other folks you know are up to; but apparently that's too 00's to hope for.

◧◩◪◨
4. axus+Jo1[view] [source] 2024-08-27 18:45:43
>>rnd0+3k1
How about a choice for which social circle you'd like to view at one time. We could call it "Circles".
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. alex11+6k2[view] [source] 2024-08-28 00:28:25
>>axus+Jo1
By far the biggest thing people remember about Google+ was the hamfisting of it (several people lost their Youtube accounts) and yet people also reported that it was otherwise a good experience (compared to the Facebook feed); one thing Google had to contend with was Facebook not offering access to the social graph so they had to build the network effects by a more difficult route

eg Facebook replacing people's email addresses, one wonders if it was partly a way to fight Google+ >>4151433

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. Alchem+CA2[view] [source] 2024-08-28 04:01:30
>>alex11+6k2
I lost my original YouTube account due to Google+ spawning a new one from my gmail address I’d used to sign up for YT in the early days.

It’s been years and I’m still mildly annoyed about losing it.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. TeaBra+nH2[view] [source] 2024-08-28 05:27:44
>>Alchem+CA2
Google also spawned a second one for me from my original gmail address, but I still use my original pre-google+ youtube account. After signing in to that google account on any given device, I have the option to switch between the two youtube accounts associated with the email.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. saghm+c24[view] [source] 2024-08-28 16:38:26
>>TeaBra+nH2
It's good that you have access to both; out of curiosity, is there any differentiation in the way it list them in the menu where you pick which one to use, or is the order consistent? I can imagine being mildly annoyed if I had to guess every time I logged into a new device which one was the one I wanted, although obviously that's still better than just not having a choice.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
9. TeaBra+nz4[view] [source] 2024-08-28 19:45:25
>>saghm+c24
The one created for google+ is usually listed first. After signing into my google account on a new device, the google+ one is also the one that I'm usually automatically signed into.
[go to top]