zlacker

>>southe+(OP)
OK, so Facebook at the request of the Biden Harris administration censored the Hunter laptop story and knew it was not actually Russian disinformation.

It’s not like you could draw a straight line between this action and something you’d categorize as election interference.

>>SV_Bub+Vh1
There was no "Biden-Harris administration" in 2020.

>>djur+h12
There was. They just weren’t in office yet.

Yet, they still pressured Facebook to suppress truth and opinion they just didn’t like.

You can chose to not defend bad actions.

>>SV_Bub+yr2
You’re thinking of the FBI, who reported to Trump. The Biden campaign reported things like the non-consensual nudes which did not have any justification as a public interest story.

>>acdha+ds2
>You’re thinking of the FBI, who reported to Trump.

You wrote that I’m sure doing your very best to believe it. Bless your heart.

>>SV_Bub+bA2
Out of curiosity, if Trump was President for 4 years and near the end of that term, didn't have control over the FBI (which seems to be what you're insinuating, please forgive me if I've misunderstood you)... Why would anyone want to elect him again?

>>shadow+ks3
Cool, so you have self-discovered that there is a bureaucracy class of nobility.

>>SV_Bub+9A3
You'll have to clarify your meaning. "Nobility" doesn't apply literally in this context and there are too many metaphorical applications to follow what you're trying to say.

If I might infer you are implying that the President can't fully control the bureaucracy due to various checks and balances put in place against capricious replacement of the whole thing (which the US tried early in its history and discovered was hellishly disruptive)... The question presents itself again. If Trump can't "lead the nobility," as it were, why elect him again?