zlacker

[return to "Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content"]
1. andy_p+ex[view] [source] 2024-08-27 14:27:46
>>southe+(OP)
I wonder if this is coming up just before the election because of the Harris campaign’s suggested policy of capital gains tax on unrealised gains for people who have over $100m in assets? I think this is a great idea personally given what these people are doing to avoid paying tax including taking out loans against their own share portfolios. Worth thinking about what people are willing to do to not pay billions of dollars worth of taxes.
◧◩
2. chrisc+fX[view] [source] 2024-08-27 16:39:09
>>andy_p+ex
Unrealized gains taxes is an extractive and totalitarian tax. Someone is always risking 100% loss until they realize those gains. It's an affront to entrepreneurial risk-taking and it's capricious. It would be just as ridiculous to allow someone to write-off unrealized losses.
◧◩◪
3. kjkjad+5Y[view] [source] 2024-08-27 16:42:18
>>chrisc+fX
Well when you have over 100m in assets in your pile of gold in the dragon lair, its time to be extractive.
◧◩◪◨
4. this_u+i41[view] [source] 2024-08-27 17:07:29
>>kjkjad+5Y
Nobody with assets over 100m has a "pile of gold", as you put it. Those assets are always productively invested in some form or another. But you would prefer that those investments be pulled, because the government are clearly much better at employing those assets productively?
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. kjkjad+mb1[view] [source] 2024-08-27 17:41:36
>>this_u+i41
Its not a question of who is better at managing money but more who needs benefit in our society. The government supports welfare programs. Someone throwing 100m in the market does not unless they are taxed to do so.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. sbsudb+xr1[view] [source] 2024-08-27 18:58:16
>>kjkjad+mb1
The US government burns money unproductively like California wild fire through a citrus field.

And there are better ways to deal with our oligarchs than braids dead proposals. Start breaking up their monopolies for one.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. yadaen+NF3[view] [source] 2024-08-28 14:35:32
>>sbsudb+xr1
The government will spend the money regardless. Does the money come from

1. inflation - a regressive tax that disproportionately takes from the poor

2. taxation as a % of wealth - takes from everyone equally

The fact is the rich pay a WAY lower tax rate, we can spend the next 1000 years playing legal cat and mouse over how to tax these people but it doesn’t get us closer to option 2 unless the government gets aggressive about collecting tax.

[go to top]