zlacker

[return to "Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content"]
1. andy_p+ex[view] [source] 2024-08-27 14:27:46
>>southe+(OP)
I wonder if this is coming up just before the election because of the Harris campaign’s suggested policy of capital gains tax on unrealised gains for people who have over $100m in assets? I think this is a great idea personally given what these people are doing to avoid paying tax including taking out loans against their own share portfolios. Worth thinking about what people are willing to do to not pay billions of dollars worth of taxes.
◧◩
2. tracke+PP[view] [source] 2024-08-27 16:08:19
>>andy_p+ex
I feel an exchange tax that included loans would probably be a much better approach. Taxing seated/parked assets, especially on the very wealthy seems like a recipe for disaster. So you have to sell, or leverage the property to pay taxes. What would trying to sell billions in stock at once, or leverage hundreds of thousands of rental properties look like to the larger economy, and what would the effect be? Also, who is going to be able to even buy the stuff, if everyone with enough money/credit is scrambling to make huge tax layouts. Will you be able to deduct the interest on loans taken out to pay these taxes?

It's not like the money is just sitting, liquid in a vault like Scrooge McDuck.

◧◩◪
3. donmcr+cX[view] [source] 2024-08-27 16:38:34
>>tracke+PP
> What would trying to sell billions in stock at once

Let them pay their taxes with stocks. Problem solved.

◧◩◪◨
4. jmb99+Op1[view] [source] 2024-08-27 18:51:05
>>donmcr+cX
Ignoring the many other reasons why that would be problematic, what happens when the US government suddenly owns notable (or even controlling) stakes in companies?
[go to top]