zlacker

>>legran+(OP)
Here is one example from the PDF:

    FROM r JOIN s USING (id)
    |> WHERE r.c < 15
    |> AGGREGATE sum(r.e) AS s GROUP BY r.d
    |> WHERE s > 3
    |> ORDER BY d
    |> SELECT d, s, rank() OVER (order by d)

Can we call this SQL anymore after this? This re-ordering of things has been done by others too, like PRQL, but they didn't call it SQL. I do think it makes things more readable.

>>Cianti+06
> Can we call this SQL anymore after this?

Maybe not, just as we don't call "rank() OVER" SQL. We call it SQL:2003. Seems we're calling this GoogleSQL. But perhaps, in both cases, we can use SQL for short?

>>random+Q6
> GoogleSQL

EssGyooGell: A Modest Proposal