zlacker

[return to "Pipe Syntax in SQL"]
1. Cianti+06[view] [source] 2024-08-24 16:16:12
>>legran+(OP)
Here is one example from the PDF:

    FROM r JOIN s USING (id)
    |> WHERE r.c < 15
    |> AGGREGATE sum(r.e) AS s GROUP BY r.d
    |> WHERE s > 3
    |> ORDER BY d
    |> SELECT d, s, rank() OVER (order by d)
Can we call this SQL anymore after this? This re-ordering of things has been done by others too, like PRQL, but they didn't call it SQL. I do think it makes things more readable.
◧◩
2. Glypto+Ub[view] [source] 2024-08-24 17:06:03
>>Cianti+06
In the example would there a difference between `|> where s > 3` and `|> having s > 3` ?

Edit: nope, just that you don't need having to exist with the pipe syntax.

[go to top]