zlacker

>>walter+(OP)
> Experts from these organizations say that the treaty undermines the global human rights of freedom of speech and expression

So, effectively nothing different than what we have today then? Organizations like the CIA / NSA / MI6 etc. exist already which undermine the rights of everyone around the world, everyday.

>>hypeat+Tg
No. Today Thailand can't request and be allowed to receive data from your ISP in Sweden if you said something bad about their king. Also, Thailand isn't allowed to start a criminal procedure and issue an arrest warrant for that kind of stuff. This basically allows autocrats to silence everyone everywhere, and the democrat states are signing up for it.

>>aa_is_+ji
So, it was OK to happen in the hand of approved countries that have no history of abusing of that privilege?

It puts more players in the game, but that doesn’t mean the game is good to start with.

>>gmusle+Xi
The treaty doesn't put "more players in the game"

It puts "more crimes" in the game that are not actually cybercrimes. A US-based journalist reporting on corruption in Russia is not a cybercriminal and should not have all his data sent by ISPs and tech companies to the Russian state.

You people haven't even read the treaty, yet are here to provide insight about "equality."