zlacker

>>fugled+(OP)
This is really cool, but I'm left with a lot of questions. Why does the font always generate the same string to replace the exclamation points as he moves from gedit to gimp? Shouldn't the LLM be creating a new "inference"?

As an aside, I originally thought this was going to generate a new font "style" that matched the text. So for example, "once upon a time" would look like a storybook style font or if you wrote something computer science-related, it would look like a tech manual font. I wonder if that's possible.

>>closet+qf
So, another poster cleared up my first question. It's probably because the seed is the same. I think it would have been a better demo if it hadn't been, though.

>>closet+ii
You got it, same seed in practice, but also just temperature = 0 for the demo actually. A few things I considered adding for the fun of it were 1) a way to specify a seed in the input text, 2) a way to using a symbol to say "I didn't like that token, try to generate another one", so you could do, say, "!" to generate tokens, "?" to replace the last generated token. So you would end up typing things like

"Once upon a time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!SEED42!!!!!??!!!??!"

and 3) actually just allow you to override the suggestions by typing what letters on your own, to be used in future inferences. At that point it'd be a fairly generic auto-complete kind of thing.

>>fugled+hD
Using the input characters to affect the token selection would increase the ‘magic’ a little.

As it is, if you go back into a string of !!!!!!!!!! That has been turned into ‘upon a time’, and try to delete the ‘a’, you’ll just be deleting an ! And the string will turn into ‘once upon a tim’.

If you could just keyboard mash to pass entropy to the token sampler, deleting a specific character would alter the generation from that point onwards.