zlacker

>>fugled+(OP)
This is really cool, but I'm left with a lot of questions. Why does the font always generate the same string to replace the exclamation points as he moves from gedit to gimp? Shouldn't the LLM be creating a new "inference"?

As an aside, I originally thought this was going to generate a new font "style" that matched the text. So for example, "once upon a time" would look like a storybook style font or if you wrote something computer science-related, it would look like a tech manual font. I wonder if that's possible.

>>closet+qf
So, another poster cleared up my first question. It's probably because the seed is the same. I think it would have been a better demo if it hadn't been, though.

>>closet+ii
But having the same "seed" doesn't guarantee the same response from an LLM, hence the question above.

>>thomas+Tt
I fail to understand how an LLM could produce two different responses from the same seed. Same seed implies all random numbers generated will be the same. So where is the source of nondeterminism?

>>wavemo+iB
I believe people are confused because ChatGPT's API exposes a seed parameter which is not guaranteed to be deterministic.

But that's due to the possibility model configuration changes on the service end and not relevant here.