zlacker

>>voisin+(OP)
Good. Tourists should sleep in hotels and locals should sleep in their flats.

Platforms like AirBnB only put oil in the fire when it comes to housing crises.

>>deutsc+82
> Tourists should sleep in hotels and locals should sleep in their flats.

What if we let people decide what they should/n't do with their own property instead?

>>mattri+X4
Because we're adults that realize garbage dumps shouldn't be next to schools. And sometimes as society we make decisions that are good for the majority of people. I'm sure you'd love it if someone poisoned your ground water, but they did it by burying toxic materials on their property.

>>thinki+K6
When Airbnb landlords won't rent to locals at all because it's not convenient enough for them do so what will you do for the good of the majority of the people? Forcefully seize their apartment because people need it?

>>mattri+A8
Those property rights exist because the locals consent to them. If the landlords' behavior undermines that consent then it only makes sense that the locals would revoke the property rights.

How else, besides continued maintenance of that consent, would property rights get their legitimacy?

>>__Matr+eb
Under that logic your breathing is a matter of their continued consent and lynch mobs are an expression of a democratic society. Protection of minority rights is an important function in government.