zlacker

[return to "Barcelona will eliminate tourist apartments"]
1. SeanAn+A3[view] [source] 2024-06-21 19:43:48
>>voisin+(OP)
Barcelona has a population of ~1.7 million. The metro area surrounding is ~5.7 million. The metro area grew by ~100k in the past four years.

They are freeing up ~10,000 houses over the next four years with this legislation. Barcelona built ~15,000 new properties between 2011 and 2020.

The math don't math. It's a drop in the bucket. The entire impact of AirBnB + all housing built in the last decade does not offset the last half decade of population growth.

Housing must be built more quickly than your population is growing to keep prices down, or you must concede that you live in a nice area where people wealthier than you wish to be and that those people are going to gentrify the area and displace locals. It's an unpleasant reality of the world.

EDIT: some good feedback in the responses. thanks! I'm being a bit dramatic by saying it's just a drop in the bucket, this action frees up more housing than was built over the same timespan, and it's possible to have effects on pricing greater than what would be inferred by the raw numbers because economics is tricky. cheers.

◧◩
2. cs702+87[view] [source] 2024-06-21 20:00:48
>>SeanAn+A3
[Deleted]

See LightHugger's comment and my response below:

>>40753303 ]

◧◩◪
3. chimpa+w9[view] [source] 2024-06-21 20:15:58
>>cs702+87
They are aware it is not a complete solution. As the article quotes him:

> “The measures we have taken will not change the situation in one day. These things take time. But with these measures we are reaching a turning point”

While some of the chosen phrasing in the article does read rather ideological, as you quoted, that could just as easily be the bent of the writer.

Your comment itself is actually more ideological and unfactual than anything in the article…

> In this case, facts and logic, being so inconvenient to ideological and political forces, likely had nothing to do with the decision.

Neither OP nor you nor any other commenter thus far has pointed out any factual inaccuracies. And nothing about the measure is illogical since incremental changes are still a step in their desired direction. And how did you determine their “likely” reasoning from a single article alone? Again, as quoted, they are aware their concerns are not fully addressed by this action alone.

One can be a political actor and still be factual and logical. Claiming otherwise is illogical and untrue. And doing so to diminish a policy you do not like …well that’s ideological and political.

[go to top]