zlacker

>>apengw+(OP)
If this really was a mistake the easiest way to deal with it would be to release people from their non disparagement agreements that were only signed by leaving employees under the duress of losing their vested equity.

It's really easy to make people whole for this, so whether that happens or not is the difference between the apologies being real or just them just backpedaling because employees got upset.

Edit: Looks like they're doing the right thing here:

> Altman’s initial statement was criticized for doing too little to make things right for former employees, but in an emailed statement, OpenAI told me that “we are identifying and reaching out to former employees who signed a standard exit agreement to make it clear that OpenAI has not and will not cancel their vested equity and releases them from nondisparagement obligations” — which goes much further toward fixing their mistake.

>>tedivm+W2
LLM cares not whether something is said or whether the action is described.

No doubt, openai is as vacuous as their product is effect. GIGO.

>>cyanyd+1f
Form follows function, art imitates life, dog owners grow to look like their dogs...

>>ecjhdn+oq
...and software products reflect the corporate structure of the companies that created them.

Think I'll be staying away from "AI" for a while longer.